Monday, April 16, 2012

The Illicit Drug Market: What the US can learn from Germany

"Drugs have taught an entire generation of American kids the metric system."  ~P.J. O'Rourke

According to Havocscope, a database that chronicles global black market trends and statistics, illicit drugs in Germany are much cheaper than they are in the United States. In 2011, the combined average price per gram of cocaine, marijuana, and heroin in the United States equaled $357, which is more than double the $149 it costs to purchase in Germany. An extreme but valid example of price discrepancy lies in the cost of MDMA tablets, otherwise known as ecstasy, in which American prices are 350% more expensive than the $7 street valued tablets found in Germany. 

Interestingly enough, this goes against all logic provided from an “economies of scale” standpoint. As you can see in the image below provided by the United Nations in regards to the flow of cocaine, the United States has a larger consumer base than Germany as well as the larger and relatively dependable processing, supply, and distribution networks coming from nearby countries in South America. One would think that mere proximity to the Americas would result in a price much lower than one required to travel from South America, transatlantic through Africa and into the EU. However, the opposite appears to be the case as German users pay half as much as Americans do for illicit drugs. 

 

So what does this price difference mean? First, we should examine the failed “War on Drugs” we experience here in the United States. Started by President Richard Nixon in 1972, it aimed to reduce illegal drug trade through policies condemning the production, distribution and consumption of illicit drugs. A fruitless idea believed that if the prices continued to increase, domestic drug use would not be affordable and therefore suffer a major blow. Therefore, today the US Drug Enforcement Agency tries to raise the street value of illicit drugs by targeting those involved in the drug trade, namely domestic suppliers and consumers. 

They have been very effective in this pursuit of the arresting of dealers and users. In 2010, of the 211,000 inmates in federal prisons, 51% of them had been incarcerated for drug related crimes. These prison sentences are not short. A drug related prison sentence can run from a year, to life in prison.

However, consumption in the United States has not declined. Despite the War on Drugs' $15.1 billion dollar budget, the United States still leads the world in drug abuse. In 2010, 43% of Americans admitted to using marijuana at least once in their lifetime and 16% had used cocaine. The Center for Disease Control estimates that nearly 9% of the American population has used illicit drugs in the past month.

In Germany however, there is a different trend. Similar to other countries’ decriminalization of drugs in the Netherlands or Portugal, Germany’s drug policy is much more progressive than that we experience in the United States. In common cases in Germany, drug addiction is not a crime. In 2001, Germany’s drug policy provided a provision allowing for safe injection sites. In 2009, after the results praising the favorable results of heroin-assisted treatment, treatment for addicts was managed as a service into Germany’s mandatory health care system. Yet, amongst the lack of penalty for users and relatively affordable prices, only a small percentage of Germans have tried drugs in comparison to the US. Only 17% of Germans have used marijuana and less than 2% of Germans admitted to ever trying cocaine.

This paints a clear argument that decriminalization and treatment is more effective than incarceration in deterring  drug use. The War on Drugs’ record of accomplishment has shown that it has been more effective at incarcerating its citizens than preventing them from using. So why not decriminalize drugs and focus on treatment here in the United States?

Well, decriminalizing certain narcotics is much easier said than done. We now have entire industries that benefit from the prohibition of drugs. As California remains on the fence about the decriminalization of marijuana, the three largest lobbyists against decriminalization have been working around the clock. The California Beer and Beverage Distributors see their competitive advantage as legal substitute to drug use being threatened. More so, the groups Public Safety First (police union) and the California Correctional Peace Officers Association (prison guard union) have been lobbying to assure that they will continue to have jobs catching and incarcerating people for drug use.

It appears that the German and American policies have taken nearly opposite approaches to deterring drug use, and in turn experienced opposite results. Germany has taken the route of treatment rather than prosecution and relative to the US, their drug problems are laughable. Meanwhile, as an effect of poorly constructed policies and an inability to change, drug abuse and incarceration in the US remains horrendously high (no pun intended). The tide seems to be changing however, as  now close to 50% of Americans favor all out legalization of marijuana. Let’s just hope the US policy makers can wise up soon.

6 comments:

AdamKatt said...

Really interesting post. In regards to what you said about how much depends on the war on drugs economically in the United States, it is clear why the government hasn't changed course in its drug policy despite widespread success with different tactics in Europe. In addition to the factors that you mentioned, the link below mentions that massive asset seizures have allowed local governments to pad their pockets. Drug related property confiscation as well as federal grants for the war on drugs has allowed police departments to buy new weapons, paramilitary gear, surveillance equipment, and raise officer salaries. Interestingly enough, these seizures are possible because the no-tolerance drug policy has actually strengthened the federal government beyond what its given by the constitution. The power to regulate use of drugs has never been given to the federal government, and the current war on drugs is actually a violation of the constitution, just as was alcohol prohibition (which was equally ineffective in reducing usage). With this perspective in mind, it seems obvious that the government is benefitting in terms of its expanding legal boundaries from its current drug policies. Even though Germany has experienced strong results from more tolerant policies, your article and this supplemental information make it clear that a change won't be taking place on our side any time soon.

http://www.fff.org/comment/com1202q.asp

Jeff said...

@Adam,

Thanks. I completely agree that the US government needs to stay out of our lives in terms of drug use solely based on the inhumanity that has resulted in terms of prison sentences.

Unfortunately though, the Feds actually can act through power of the constitution granted by the commerce clause. So, what could be made legal in California would still be illegal on a federal level if it effected interstate commerce. That's why our system is stupid.

Greg Emery said...

I find it hard to believe that so few Germans have tried drugs. But maybe there is a real difference here between Germany and the US.

Mark said...

The War on Drugs exemplifies the old adage that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. So why the federal prohibition?

You touched on it in your post and Adam expanded on it with his comment but there is just too much money spread out over too many entrenched interests to expect any real reform. From prison guards, to private prisons, to the DEA, and Budweiser. None of them want to see the legalization of any scheduled narcotics. It's ironic that a new Budweiser commercial trumpets the end of alcohol prohibition as a shining moment for the company all while they lobby against any efforts at drug reform in the USA.

From what I've read it seems like another huge hurdle to drug reform is the fact that it's near political suicide for most politicians to suggest legalization. From an anecdotal perspective, I find it horrifyingly fascinating how seemingly intelligent, well-reasoned people that I know turn into irrational piles of mush at the mention of drug legalization.

Hopefully some other people jump back in here because this is an interesting discussion worth having.

Anonymous said...

"This paints a clear argument that decriminalization and treatment is more effective than incarceration in deterring drug use."

This an utterly ridiculous argument - comparing two countries where many variables differ and attributing the difference in drug consumption to only one variable (more lenient policy) without any attempt to control for the other variables. This is a perfect example of pseudoscience.

Other possible variables, just from the top of my head:

- less poverty, less of an underclass, less "ghettos" (probably the most important variable)

- more relaxed rules of alcohol consumption, drawing young people towards alcohol rather than drugs (beer at 16, every other booze at 18 - I think it is not an exaggeration to say that for a 19 years old American college student it is often easier to buy pot than alcohol, as the local dealer doesn't ask for an ID!)

-completely different geographical situation, not having a huge border with Latin America

-ethnic minorites tend to come from countries / cultures that frown on drugs (Turks, Arabs don't write pop songs about how cool is the yeyo)

-a more disciplined, order-loving, more self-control oriented and MUCH less individualistic culture, a "mama's good boy" attitude observable in young people (outside the large techno-house subculture at least). When parents/teachers say something is wrong, young Germans often obey, as they were raised in a culture that puts a lot of emphasis on accepting the rules. (This can be quite boring.)

-the large techno-house subculture generally uses different drugs than this two mentioned in the previous paragraph.

BR

Shenpen

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymus: I think a big part of what you say about German unindividual law and order culture is just prejudice, at least in Berlin and other cities...

H.S., Berlin, Germany